Texas tells Supreme Court it shouldn't be 'left holding the bag' for US nuclear waste

By Maureen Groppe

March 5, 2025

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Wednesday debated how to dispose of the nation’s nuclear waste as Texas tried to convince the justices to block a storage site near the state’s border with New Mexico.  

Texas and a Texas-based oil and gas extraction organization argued the Nuclear Regulatory Commission lacked the authority to approve a site to store up to 5,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel for 40 years.

“If anyone thinks this is temporary, I have a bridge to sell you,” said Texas Solicitor General Aaron Nielson, referencing the old yarn about the Brooklyn Bridge. “What the commission has just done is put a permanent terrorist’s bullseye on the most productive oil field in the country.”

The federal government says the Texas plaintiffs are misreading the law in a way that would disrupt the nuclear power industry, which supplies about one-fifth of the nation’s electricity. Since 1980, the NRC has allowed on-site and off-site storage, said Malcolm Stewart, the Justice Department’s deputy solicitor general.

“That system allows a substantial role for private market responses to the country’s nuclear waste storage issues,” while ensuring the storage is safe, Stewart said.


READ MORE

Previous
Previous

Supreme Court wrestles with nation’s frustrating search for nuclear waste storage

Next
Next

U.S. Supreme Court takes up Texas nuclear waste disposal case